Challenge Your Exam Readiness With Our Free CAPM Practice Questions

Facilitated workshops (e.g., JAD) bring key stakeholders and delivery team members together to co-create and reconcile requirements in real time. Skilled facilitation, visual modeling (draft mockups), and decision frameworks (e.g., weighted scoring, MoSCoW) help expose assumptions, constraints, and dependencies. This approach reduces the ping-pong of asynchronous feedback and builds shared ownership in the outcome. Interviews (Option A) are valuable to gather perspectives but can entrench differences without direct negotiation. Surveys (Option C) can be efficient for broad input but are poor for resolving nuanced conflicts or validating feasibility. Defaulting to the most senior voice (Option D) risks suboptimal design and stakeholder dissatisfaction and contradicts collaborative principles emphasized in CAPM. Workshops should produce tangible artifacts—agreed acceptance criteria, a prototype, and decision logs—feeding the Requirements Traceability Matrix and backlog. Establish rules of engagement, define success criteria upfront, and timebox discussions. Document any open issues and assign owners to close them, ensuring traceability and preventing later scope disputes.