Challenge Your Exam Readiness With Our Free LEED Green Associate Practice Questions

A credible energy model must reflect the actual design and intended operation. Cross-checking internal loads, schedules, envelope assemblies, and system efficiencies against coordinated drawings, specifications, and accepted submittals reduces inconsistencies that trigger reviewer comments. Controls matter: sequences for economizers, temperature/pressure resets, demand-controlled ventilation, and setpoints should be represented and documented. Tying assumptions back to the Owner’s Project Requirements and Basis of Design provides traceability. A concise modeling narrative that lists key assumptions and justifies atypical choices speeds review and helps the team maintain alignment during late-stage changes. Generic schedules and isolated vendor data ignore interactive effects and often misstate performance. Submitting a rough model “to see what happens” wastes cycles and can jeopardize the schedule. A disciplined, documented modeling process aligns with LEED’s performance ethos and simplifies both design decisions and review.